Election Cycle Emerges as the Year of the Pledge, but Some Candidates Resist

They are asked to state their opposition to abortion rights. They are pressed to pledge support for a constitutional amendment to balance the budget.

They have been asked to oppose pornography, women in combat and Sharia law ? all part of a ?marriage vow? pledge.

Candidate pledges, an incidental part of past presidential elections, have exploded this year as advocacy groups seek to hold a future Republican president accountable.

Driven by the same anti-Washington fury that delivered scores of new Republicans to the House last year, the pledges aim to impose litmus tests on candidates and discourage them from altering positions later under political pressure.

?At a time when voters have grown skeptical about politicians and candidates who run on a certain platform only to backtrack once elected, signing a pledge is a good way to strengthen our political promises,? Rick Santorum, a Republican presidential candidate and former Pennsylvania senator, wrote in an opinion column last week.

Mr. Santorum has been one of the most agreeable pledge signers. He has added his name even to compacts that rivals have abstained from because of controversial passages.

?The G.O.P. is reading the mood of a key part of their constituency as telling them, ?Hold the line, we don?t want you to compromise,? ? said Donna R. Hoffman, a political scientist at the University of Northern Iowa. ?A particular sector of the electorate believes compromise is invalid at this point; it?s selling out your principles.?

That conviction is apparent in the deadlock over raising the national debt ceiling in Washington, where freshman House Republicans, many elected with Tea Party support, are resisting any deal whatsoever that includes raising taxes. Others are opposing an increase in the debt ceiling under any circumstances.

Behind that orthodoxy, some analysts see the influence of the most successful pact of all, the Taxpayer Protection Pledge issued by the small-government champion Grover Norquist, who over two decades has gotten about 95 percent of Republican members of Congress to commit to not raising taxes.

Inspired by Mr. Norquist, other groups have jumped into the pledge game.

Mr. Santorum did not hesitate to sign the marriage vow pledge last week, which was written by an evangelical Christian group in Iowa. After public criticism, the group deleted a sentence stating that black children under slavery were more likely to be raised by both parents than ?after the election of the U.S.A.?s first African-American president.?

Michele Bachmann, a Minnesota congresswoman and presidential candidate, also signed the pledge, although she told Fox News that the slavery sentence, which appeared in a preamble, was ?not on a document that I signed.?

The pledge, two dense pages with footnotes, binds signers to try to block same-sex marriage as well as be faithful to their spouses, oppose women ?in forward combat roles? and support ?robust childbearing and reproduction.?

Other Republican candidates refused to sign, including Tim Pawlenty, a former Minnesota governor, who offered a lengthy explanation, perhaps mindful that the pledge?s sponsor, Bob Vander Plaats, is influential with the socially conservative voters who turn out en masse for the Iowa caucuses.

He also posted a six-minute video on YouTube describing how his faith shapes his view that marriage should be limited to ?one man and one woman.?

The campaign of Mitt Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, was blunter. He found the pledge ?undignified and inappropriate for a presidential campaign,? a spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said.

Mr. Vander Plaats said that despite winning over only two candidates to his cause, the pledge was not backfiring. ?It?s raised the level of marriage and family in the debate,? he said.

Another pledge known as Cap, Cut and Balance has had a swift impact since it was drafted two months ago. Mr. Romney cites it on the campaign trail, and the pledge is the basis for bills to be introduced in Congress shortly that represent Speaker John A. Boehner?s latest response to the White House on the debt-ceiling crisis.

It would commit Congress to cutting current spending, capping future expenditures and passing a constitutional amendment requiring balanced annual budgets.

The pledge was written by national Tea Party groups including FreedomWorks; three Republican senators, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Mike Lee of Utah and Marco Rubio of Florida; and a Washington public relations firm. ?It was a nearly unprecedented coming together of the conservative movement,? said Joe Brettell, an executive of the firm, CRC Public Relations.

Candidate pledges seem largely a Republican phenomenon this time, though liberal groups have promoted them in the past, including a Fight Washington Corruption pledge that MoveOn.org said about 200 Congressional incumbents and candidates signed in 2010.

Critics say the impact of pledges can be pernicious, and they cite the profound impact of the 25-year history of the antitax pledge from Americans for Tax Reform, Mr. Norquist?s group. While supporters say it has enforced party discipline on a central tenet of Republicans? belief, it has also backed them into an absolutist position.

Indeed, had Congressional Republicans been willing to make small concessions on raising some taxes, they might have already gotten many of the spending cuts they wanted from the White House by now.

?The danger of these pledges is it does prevent candidates from achieving 80 percent of what they want,? said Alex Castellanos, a Republican strategist who worked for John McCain?s presidential campaign in 2008.

One candidate, Jon M. Hunstman Jr., a former governor of Utah, refused to sign anything.

?I don?t sign pledges ? other than the Pledge of Allegiance and a pledge to my wife,? Mr. Huntsman has taken to saying on the campaign trail.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d0206b762b787852546b27fe865ff954

the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks seattle public schools worldstarhiphop the game season 4 episode 1

Blog - Cloaks 'n' Croaks

Why Is Biomanufacturing So Hard?

Earlier this year, the Cambridge-based biotech firm Genzyme announced the latest in a series of manufacturing delays for Fabrazyme, a biological drug that treats a rare genetic disorder, after one lot of the drug was found to be contaminated. The news followed a more severe setback in 2009, when both Fabrazyme and another drug were contaminated with a virus; the problem closed the manufacturing plant and created major shortages.

Genzyme isn't alone in these issues. Biologics?drugs made through a biological process rather than chemical synthesis, a category that includes recombinant proteins, vaccines, and antibodies?are the fastest-growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. In 2008, nearly 30 percent of revenue from the top 100 drugs came from biologics, a figure that is expected to rise to 50 percent by 2014.

But the same factors that make biologics powerful drugs also make them a challenge to manufacture. They typically mimic proteins and other molecules found in living organisms and can target harmful entities, such as some cancer cells, with great accuracy; many of the most promising new drugs for cancer and other diseases fall into this class. Biologics tend to be larger, more complex molecules than drugs synthesized through chemical reactions, which adds to production challenges and makes them costly. A single dose of some biologic therapies can cost $10,000.

Biologics are most often produced by cells growing in a bioreactor, a vat designed to maintain carefully calibrated conditions. Because the cells are alive, "every time you run a reactor, the result can be a bit different," says Chris Love, a chemical engineer who is part of MIT's Biomanufacturing Research Program. This inherent variability makes the process both expensive and unpredictable.

Another issue is that for biologics to win approval from regulatory agencies, it's not enough for the drug itself to be approved, as is the case with small-molecule drugs; the manufacturing procedure must be approved as well. While this is important for safety's sake, it also makes it costly to change the production process after it's been approved, and that discourages innovation. "By the time the drug is in the marketplace, you are working with old technology," says Charles Cooney, a chemical engineer at MIT. "You have to lock in the technology many years before launch of a commercial product."

And even when developing experimental drugs, makers tend to stick with methods that have previously been proved safe. As a result, new advances in systems biology and microtechnology have not been integrated into biomanufacturing, says Love.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=519daa3bd5effe44ca931855f3c0364b

terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks seattle public schools

Fallback Plan Moving to Fore as Budget Talks Stall

Given the impasse, House Republicans scheduled a vote for Tuesday on a measure that would cut deeply into the federal budget, cap government spending for the years ahead and approve a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. The Democratic-controlled Senate may vote Wednesday on a balanced budget amendment.

While neither measure will become law, given Democrats? opposition, Republicans are eager to show their conservative base that they are not retreating, and that they will press their case for vastly shrinking the government through the 2012 elections.

Mr. Obama signaled that he would support the fallback plan, proposed by Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican minority leader, which would allow for the debt limit to be raised and defer the bigger budget fight.

But the president used his third news conference in two weeks to call again for a ?big deal? of up to $4 trillion in 10-year savings from spending cuts and tax increases on the wealthy and corporations. And he claimed to have public opinion ? including a majority of Republicans ? on his side in supporting tax increases as part of the solution.

Such a deal seemed out of reach; Republicans refuse to consider tax increases, and without them Mr. Obama will not agree to deep reductions in Medicare.

But top advisers ? William Daley, the White House chief of staff, and Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary ? were on Capitol Hill to meet with Speaker John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, given Mr. Boehner?s continued interest in a deficit-reduction compromise despite some Republicans? resistance.

Publicly, Mr. Boehner gave no hint of accord. ?We?re in the fourth quarter here,? he said, adding: ?We asked the president to lead. We asked him to put forward a plan ? not a speech, a real plan ? and he hasn?t. We will.?

Both sides are eager to avert a crisis, and the blame that would go with it, if the government breaches a $14.3 trillion borrowing ceiling on Aug. 2.

?So now the debate will move from a room in the White House to the House and Senate floors,? Mr. McConnell said.

He was in talks with the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, on Mr. McConnell?s proposal, which is intended to clear the way for an increase in the debt limit over Congress?s disapproval, and without the equal spending cuts that Republicans had demanded.

The McConnell plan hinges on the certainty that Congress could not muster a two-thirds vote to override Mr. Obama?s veto of any disapproval measures, but it continues to draw opposition from many Republicans.

Mr. Obama gave the plan his back-handed blessing as a last-gasp option for avoiding a government default. ?It is constructive to say that if Washington operates as usual and can?t get anything done, let?s at least avert Armageddon,? he said. 

Mr. McConnell and Mr. Reid were also discussing the creation of a bipartisan panel of 12 lawmakers to develop a deficit-reduction package. Senior senators would also like to impose spending caps for the next two years, to ease the threat of government shutdowns through 2012.

The administration and many lawmakers saw the Senate deliberations between Mr. McConnell and Mr. Reid as the most likely avenue for achieving an increase in the debt limit.

And in contrast with Mr. Obama?s interest in the McConnell plan, the president was quick to oppose the ?cut, cap and balance? proposal that House Republicans are to vote on next week.

The House proposal would prohibit raising the debt limit unless Congress sends to the states a proposed balanced-budget constitutional amendment. It would also cut federal spending more than $100 billion in 2012. And it would cap future annual spending at a level equal to 18 percent of the total economy; spending for decades has averaged about 20 percent of the gross domestic product and is projected to rise for years as the government faces higher costs for the health and retirement benefits of the aging baby boomers.

House Republicans cheered their leaders? decision to push the proposal, saying it could put them back on the offensive after a week in which many felt out-flanked by the White House.

But Mr. Obama said the proposed spending cap ?would require cutting Social Security or Medicare substantially.? As for a balanced-budget amendment, he said, ?We don?t need a constitutional amendment to do our jobs.?

Mr. Obama attacked Congressional Republicans for rebuffing ?shared sacrifice and a balanced approach? in their zeal to cut spending while refusing to raise taxes on the wealthy or close corporate tax loopholes.

Without citing specific polls, he told reporters at the White House: ?The clear majority of Republican voters think that any deficit reduction package should have a balanced approach and should include some revenues.  That?s not just Democrats ? that?s the majority of Republicans.? He also cited support from ?a whole slew of Republican officials from previous administrations? and bipartisan commissions for higher revenues along with spending cuts.

Polls consistently show that a majority of Americans favor higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations to help reduce federal debt, but results for Republicans vary depending on the wording of poll questions.

A New York Times/CBS News poll in April showed 55 percent of Republicans supporting an increase in federal taxes for households with incomes of more than $250,000 a year, starting in 2013, as Mr. Obama proposes. In May, the Pew Research Center found 49 percent of Republicans approving.

 In 2012, Mr. Obama said: ?We?re going to have a big, serious debate about what we believe is the right way to guide America forward and to win the future. And I?m confident that I will win that debate, because I think that we?ve got the better approach.?

But the president also acknowledged differences within his party, given liberal Democrats? opposition to some of his proposed concessions to Republicans on entitlement programs like Medicare. In his news conference, Mr. Obama endorsed means-testing for Medicare so that higher-income beneficiaries pay more, but he stopped short of endorsing a gradual increase in the eligibility age to 67 from 65.

Robert Pear contributed reporting.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a94073ca6234ddd7447413f29ff3d816

scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks seattle public schools worldstarhiphop the game season 4 episode 1 freddie mitchell simon chipmunk lebron james twitter

Hard Lines iPhone Review

Hard Lines iPhone Review

Posted on 26th Jun 2011 at 10:44 by David Hing with 9 comments

Back when mobile phones were still thought of as a new idea, Nokia's 3210 was highly sought after in many circles for its built in version of the highly addictive game Snake. Fast forward a decade, and Hard Lines is attempting to be a worthy successor to that classic title.

The mechanics of Hard Lines are simple. With simple directional strokes of your finger, you steer a line around the screen towards randomly spawning markers, accruing points while avoiding other lines that enter from the sides of the screen.

Slick and neatly designed, Hard Lines is clearly influenced by the Light Cycles from Tron, yet it doesn't limit itself to that one style of play; there are several variations. In some modes, you gain points by getting opposing lines to crash into you or the walls; in others you race against the clock, or just try to last for as long as possible. There are also some good bonuses, such as the occasional power up that enables you to crash through any other competing lines without killing yourself.


The gameplay is occasionally made overly complicated, however, via the addition of dialogue that bikes may utter in the middle of a match. This appears as a single line of text and, while it's often funny, it's usually just a distraction that obscures your view.

Aside from this, though, the balancing is beautiful and the game manages to be both punishing and forgiving at once. Each line is only a single pixel wide, for example, but you only need to pass near an item on the screen to collect it, avoiding any frustrating situations where you might end up circling it forever. Not only this, but the very narrow nature of your line means the game can afford to throw a lot of competing lines at you at any one time. In particular, the Gauntlet mode continually spawns large numbers of other lines rapidly, resulting in an intense session that's highly satisfying when it goes your way.

Verdict: Hard Lines is a well designed, easily controlled, multifaceted version of Snake with enough new material and creativity behind it to stop it being called a straightforward clone.

Hard Lines is available from the AppStore for 59p / 99c.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bit-tech/blog/~3/AtnThqURR0c/

simon chipmunk lebron james twitter jimmer fredette thomas tew rum issaquah school district the game tv show lasso of truth terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet

Why Is Biomanufacturing So Hard?

Earlier this year, the Cambridge-based biotech firm Genzyme announced the latest in a series of manufacturing delays for Fabrazyme, a biological drug that treats a rare genetic disorder, after one lot of the drug was found to be contaminated. The news followed a more severe setback in 2009, when both Fabrazyme and another drug were contaminated with a virus; the problem closed the manufacturing plant and created major shortages.

Genzyme isn't alone in these issues. Biologics?drugs made through a biological process rather than chemical synthesis, a category that includes recombinant proteins, vaccines, and antibodies?are the fastest-growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. In 2008, nearly 30 percent of revenue from the top 100 drugs came from biologics, a figure that is expected to rise to 50 percent by 2014.

But the same factors that make biologics powerful drugs also make them a challenge to manufacture. They typically mimic proteins and other molecules found in living organisms and can target harmful entities, such as some cancer cells, with great accuracy; many of the most promising new drugs for cancer and other diseases fall into this class. Biologics tend to be larger, more complex molecules than drugs synthesized through chemical reactions, which adds to production challenges and makes them costly. A single dose of some biologic therapies can cost $10,000.

Biologics are most often produced by cells growing in a bioreactor, a vat designed to maintain carefully calibrated conditions. Because the cells are alive, "every time you run a reactor, the result can be a bit different," says Chris Love, a chemical engineer who is part of MIT's Biomanufacturing Research Program. This inherent variability makes the process both expensive and unpredictable.

Another issue is that for biologics to win approval from regulatory agencies, it's not enough for the drug itself to be approved, as is the case with small-molecule drugs; the manufacturing procedure must be approved as well. While this is important for safety's sake, it also makes it costly to change the production process after it's been approved, and that discourages innovation. "By the time the drug is in the marketplace, you are working with old technology," says Charles Cooney, a chemical engineer at MIT. "You have to lock in the technology many years before launch of a commercial product."

And even when developing experimental drugs, makers tend to stick with methods that have previously been proved safe. As a result, new advances in systems biology and microtechnology have not been integrated into biomanufacturing, says Love.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=519daa3bd5effe44ca931855f3c0364b

thomas tew rum issaquah school district the game tv show lasso of truth terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious

Fallback Plan Moving to Fore as Budget Talks Stall

Given the impasse, House Republicans scheduled a vote for Tuesday on a measure that would cut deeply into the federal budget, cap government spending for the years ahead and approve a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. The Democratic-controlled Senate may vote Wednesday on a balanced budget amendment.

While neither measure will become law, given Democrats? opposition, Republicans are eager to show their conservative base that they are not retreating, and that they will press their case for vastly shrinking the government through the 2012 elections.

Mr. Obama signaled that he would support the fallback plan, proposed by Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican minority leader, which would allow for the debt limit to be raised and defer the bigger budget fight.

But the president used his third news conference in two weeks to call again for a ?big deal? of up to $4 trillion in 10-year savings from spending cuts and tax increases on the wealthy and corporations. And he claimed to have public opinion ? including a majority of Republicans ? on his side in supporting tax increases as part of the solution.

Such a deal seemed out of reach; Republicans refuse to consider tax increases, and without them Mr. Obama will not agree to deep reductions in Medicare.

But top advisers ? William Daley, the White House chief of staff, and Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary ? were on Capitol Hill to meet with Speaker John A. Boehner, Republican of Ohio, given Mr. Boehner?s continued interest in a deficit-reduction compromise despite some Republicans? resistance.

Publicly, Mr. Boehner gave no hint of accord. ?We?re in the fourth quarter here,? he said, adding: ?We asked the president to lead. We asked him to put forward a plan ? not a speech, a real plan ? and he hasn?t. We will.?

Both sides are eager to avert a crisis, and the blame that would go with it, if the government breaches a $14.3 trillion borrowing ceiling on Aug. 2.

?So now the debate will move from a room in the White House to the House and Senate floors,? Mr. McConnell said.

He was in talks with the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, on Mr. McConnell?s proposal, which is intended to clear the way for an increase in the debt limit over Congress?s disapproval, and without the equal spending cuts that Republicans had demanded.

The McConnell plan hinges on the certainty that Congress could not muster a two-thirds vote to override Mr. Obama?s veto of any disapproval measures, but it continues to draw opposition from many Republicans.

Mr. Obama gave the plan his back-handed blessing as a last-gasp option for avoiding a government default. ?It is constructive to say that if Washington operates as usual and can?t get anything done, let?s at least avert Armageddon,? he said. 

Mr. McConnell and Mr. Reid were also discussing the creation of a bipartisan panel of 12 lawmakers to develop a deficit-reduction package. Senior senators would also like to impose spending caps for the next two years, to ease the threat of government shutdowns through 2012.

The administration and many lawmakers saw the Senate deliberations between Mr. McConnell and Mr. Reid as the most likely avenue for achieving an increase in the debt limit.

And in contrast with Mr. Obama?s interest in the McConnell plan, the president was quick to oppose the ?cut, cap and balance? proposal that House Republicans are to vote on next week.

The House proposal would prohibit raising the debt limit unless Congress sends to the states a proposed balanced-budget constitutional amendment. It would also cut federal spending more than $100 billion in 2012. And it would cap future annual spending at a level equal to 18 percent of the total economy; spending for decades has averaged about 20 percent of the gross domestic product and is projected to rise for years as the government faces higher costs for the health and retirement benefits of the aging baby boomers.

House Republicans cheered their leaders? decision to push the proposal, saying it could put them back on the offensive after a week in which many felt out-flanked by the White House.

But Mr. Obama said the proposed spending cap ?would require cutting Social Security or Medicare substantially.? As for a balanced-budget amendment, he said, ?We don?t need a constitutional amendment to do our jobs.?

Mr. Obama attacked Congressional Republicans for rebuffing ?shared sacrifice and a balanced approach? in their zeal to cut spending while refusing to raise taxes on the wealthy or close corporate tax loopholes.

Without citing specific polls, he told reporters at the White House: ?The clear majority of Republican voters think that any deficit reduction package should have a balanced approach and should include some revenues.  That?s not just Democrats ? that?s the majority of Republicans.? He also cited support from ?a whole slew of Republican officials from previous administrations? and bipartisan commissions for higher revenues along with spending cuts.

Polls consistently show that a majority of Americans favor higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations to help reduce federal debt, but results for Republicans vary depending on the wording of poll questions.

A New York Times/CBS News poll in April showed 55 percent of Republicans supporting an increase in federal taxes for households with incomes of more than $250,000 a year, starting in 2013, as Mr. Obama proposes. In May, the Pew Research Center found 49 percent of Republicans approving.

 In 2012, Mr. Obama said: ?We?re going to have a big, serious debate about what we believe is the right way to guide America forward and to win the future. And I?m confident that I will win that debate, because I think that we?ve got the better approach.?

But the president also acknowledged differences within his party, given liberal Democrats? opposition to some of his proposed concessions to Republicans on entitlement programs like Medicare. In his news conference, Mr. Obama endorsed means-testing for Medicare so that higher-income beneficiaries pay more, but he stopped short of endorsing a gradual increase in the eligibility age to 67 from 65.

Robert Pear contributed reporting.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a94073ca6234ddd7447413f29ff3d816

lasso of truth terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

Posted on 8th Jul 2011 at 14:20 by Podcast with 11 comments

It's been a while since our last podcast so James, Paul, Antony and Harry had plenty to talk about when they took their seats in the studio this week.

First on the agenda was James and Paul's trip to Computex in Taiwan, where they got to see what the industry had planned for the next six months. Certain things were of particular interest to us though such as the LGA2011 boards being shown at the exhibition.

The other big slice of news that's hit since our last podcast is the launch of AMD's new desktop Lynx processors. The APUs (as AMD calls them) are potentially interesting for those looking for a low cost rig that's also capable of gaming.

Finally, we sneak in a little discussion about Intel's new 50-core maths co-processor card and attempt to answer a reader question about thermal compound.

As always, we've also set up our weekly competition, the lucky winner of which will walk away with a brand new Corsair VX550W PSU.

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

As ever, the bit-tech hardware podcast features music by Brad Sucks, and was recorded on Shure microphones. You can download the podcast direct, listen in-browser or subscribe through iTunes using the links below. Also, be sure to let us know your thoughts about the discussion in the forums.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bit-tech/blog/~3/EUee9PuDJKs/

terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks seattle public schools

Microsoft: the dream is to sell 100 million Windows phones per year

This week at Microsoft's Worldwide Partner Conference, Kevin Turner, Microsoft's COO, announced during his keynote that the company hopes to sell up to 100 million Windows Phone devices annually. "We have dreams and aspirations that we can get to 100 million units per year with that single deal," he said.

The software giant plans to mainly lean on Nokia, which agreed to switch to Windows Phone as its primary platform. Nokia's first Windows phone is codenamed Sea Ray. At the conference, Microsoft also showed off four unannounced Windows phones from Acer, ZTE, Fujitsu, and Samsung.

Windows Phone users should keep their eyes peeled for Windows Phone 7.5 (codenamed Mango), which is expected to begin rolling out this fall. Check out our preview of the update from last month.

There is talk that Microsoft is already working on the next Windows Phone updates, codenamed Tango and Apollo. Last year, we heard of that the second major update to Windows Phone will be Apollo, due toward the end of 2012. At some point Microsoft will have to release Windows Phone 8. One of these updates could indeed be Windows Phone 8, or an update to Windows Phone 8.

It's generally accepted that Windows Phone is not selling well. AT&T Mobility CEO believes things will start to pick up with codename Mango and as the Windows Phone Marketplace gains more apps. Nokia CEO Stephen Elop meanwhile argues that Windows Phone scores better than Android and iPhone with consumers, but OEMs are doing their best work for Android. He believes that once Nokia starts doing its best work for Windows Phone, the platform will take off.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://www.techspot.com/news/44716-microsoft-the-dream-is-to-sell-100-million-windows-phones-per-year.html

lasso of truth terrence j most popular thanksgiving side dish the game bet lights out nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

Posted on 8th Jul 2011 at 14:20 by Podcast with 11 comments

It's been a while since our last podcast so James, Paul, Antony and Harry had plenty to talk about when they took their seats in the studio this week.

First on the agenda was James and Paul's trip to Computex in Taiwan, where they got to see what the industry had planned for the next six months. Certain things were of particular interest to us though such as the LGA2011 boards being shown at the exhibition.

The other big slice of news that's hit since our last podcast is the launch of AMD's new desktop Lynx processors. The APUs (as AMD calls them) are potentially interesting for those looking for a low cost rig that's also capable of gaming.

Finally, we sneak in a little discussion about Intel's new 50-core maths co-processor card and attempt to answer a reader question about thermal compound.

As always, we've also set up our weekly competition, the lucky winner of which will walk away with a brand new Corsair VX550W PSU.

Hardware 25 - What, no Tanks?

As ever, the bit-tech hardware podcast features music by Brad Sucks, and was recorded on Shure microphones. You can download the podcast direct, listen in-browser or subscribe through iTunes using the links below. Also, be sure to let us know your thoughts about the discussion in the forums.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bit-tech/blog/~3/EUee9PuDJKs/

nyc school closings scelestious stephanie seymour and son david nelson the chipmunks seattle public schools worldstarhiphop the game season 4 episode 1 freddie mitchell simon chipmunk