Google Invests $1 Million Dollars in Shweeb?s Human Powered Monorail [TNW Google]

As part of Google?s Project 10 to 100, they?ve donated $1 million dollars to Shweeb, a company that wants to make an eco-friendly, human-powered monorail. The project sorted 150,000 ideas from over 170 countries, narrowing it down to 16 final ideas, which were then voted on by the public. In the end, Google donated a total of $10 million to five winning projects, working on global issues. Shweeb won for driving innovation in public transport.

The human-powered pods on the monorail are intended for short to medium distances in urban settings. Google?s $1 million will fund research and development to test the ?recumbent cycling technology.? Basically, Shweeb puts humans in clear pods which are then powered by people kicking their legs as if they were on a bicycle. The original adventure ride concept system is situated at Agroventures Park in Rotorua, New Zealand.

See a video of it here:

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://thenextweb.com/google/2010/11/20/google-invests-1-million-dollars-in-shweebs-human-powered-monorail/

staged terror gene shalit veterans day quotes

5 Tablets To Look Out For In 2011 [TNW Gadgets]

So you?re waging a battle in your head. Do you buy a tablet this year? Or do you wait to see what 2011 holds? Well, we already gave you a guide on what tablets to consider if you?re going to buy this year, but how about next year?

While some of these are merely whispers in the wind, there is no doubt that 2011is going to spawn some pretty beautiful tablet devices. So, without further ado, here are 5 to keep in mind before you pull the trigger on a first generation iPad or Samsung Galaxy Tab.

5. LG (Optimus) Pad

LG hasn?t announced their tablet device yet but if the specs hold up, this is going to be a very, very solid device. Right now, the device is known as the LG Pad or the LG Optimus Pad and according to a senior official from LG Electronics, who probably lost his job, it will be coming in Q1 with Android Honeycomb.

You know, Google?s Android OS that actually works well on a tablet device.

In its defense, the Galaxy Tab will be getting Honeycomb at some point but don?t count on it being any time soon after its launch. Why? Just have a look at the whole Galaxy S/Froyo debacle.

It?s also supposed to have a 8.9 inch display with a Tegra 2 chip from Nvidia inside.

Sound good?

We thought so.

4. HTC?s Tablet

The tablet that doesn?t even have a name.

According to a report by Digitimes, HTC is at work on a tablet device that is, surprise, scheduled to be headed to market in Q1 of next year.  And it looks like it?s going to be an absolute beast.

It apparently has a 1280 x 720 resolution screen which is mind blowing to say the least.  The Samsung Galaxy Tab, whose screen blew me away, has a 1024 x 600 resolution display.

Supposedly, other specs include an Nvidia Tegra 2 chip, 2GB of internal memory, W-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, and a 32GB memory card.

No word on the screen size, although with a resolution like that, expect it to be big.

3. Motorola MOTOPAD/Motorola Stingray

According to Elder Murtazin, the Motorola MOTOPAD, which may or may not be the same device as the Motorola Stingray, has apparently been selected to bring in the era of Android 3.0 aka Honeycomb.

The MOTOPAD will apparently rock a 7 inch screen which is different than what a leaked Verizon roadmap had for the Stingray. That device supposedly had a 10 inch screen, 16GB of on-board storage, and an Nvidia Tegra 2, and had LTE capabilities. Might these be the same thing or does Motorola have two tablets on the way?

We?ll know in due time since the Stingray was rumored to be out in Q1.

2. BlackBerry PlayBook

This is the only official, living and breathing, tablet on this list and it might turn out to be one of the best.

You might have heard. RIM is bringing their own tablet to the market, sometime in the early part of 2011 and it?s called the BlackBerry PlayBook. In case you missed it, take a look at this quick little video demo of the device that popped up a few days ago.

Watch it and tell us it doesn?t look sweet.

As far as specs are concerned, the PlayBook rocks a 7 inch display with 1024 x 600 resolution, Cortex A9-based, dual-core 1GHz CPU which RIM says is faster than the iPad?s processor, 1GB of RAM, two cameras (one front facing that is 3MP and a rear facing at 5MP), 1080p HD video, HDMI port, 16GB/32GB/64GB versions as well as the ability to run Flash and Adobe Air apps.

RIM is hoping to sell a lot of these and we wouldn?t be surprised if they do.

1. Apple iPad 2/Second Generation iPad

Last and certainly not least, Apple?s rumored update to the original iPad. Will it be called the iPad 2? Will it simply be the iPad once again? Little is known about Apple?s plans but there is a lot of speculation out there.

We recently reported that the iPad 2 could possibly be ready for production in Q1 of next year meaning it has a chance to be out sometime in Q1.

How about features?

Well, it?s said to have two cameras (yes!), retina display, USB ports, and an upgraded ?smart? bezel.

So there they are guys. Unfortunately, this might have spoiled some plans to pick up a Galaxy Tab or an iPad but hey, with something as expensive as a tablet, it?s always smart to weigh your options before you make a decision.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2010/11/21/5-tablets-to-look-out-for-in-2011/

charlyne yi reba mcentire marie osmond son death

Google vs Facebook ? a much needed intervention [TNW Social Media]

Hi Google, hey Facebook, sit yourselves down. I need to have a word with you both.

You see, it?s not escaped our notice that you?ve both had a bit of a fall-out over the past few weeks, and quite frankly it?s getting silly.

Google, you started the spat by blocking Facebook users from searching their Gmail accounts to find friends. Your reason for this? Because Facebook doesn?t allow users to do the same thing, find users on other services by searching their Facebook account. Facebook, you quickly found a way around this using Google?s own Contacts export tool, much to the anger of Google who quickly added a feistily-worded warning that users would be ?trapping? their contacts if they went ahead.

Now Facebook, TechCrunch reports that you?ve decided drop all mention of Gmail from your contacts search tool entirely. In the world of Facebook, Gmail has ceased to exist.

Okay, both of you ? listen. No, stop sticking your tongues out at each other ? listen. This little fight is doing nothing of benefit at all for the most important people of all ? the users.

Google, it?s all very honourable for you to say that anyone who transfers contacts data from Gmail should offer the ability to move it on again, but here?s the thing ? those contacts are my data, not yours. If I want to take them and put them into a ?closed shop? like Facebook, that?s my choice entirely. Besides, I won?t be ?trapping? them as I still have a nice open copy on lovely, cuddly, open Google. Except you?re not so cuddly and open now because you?ve stooped to Facebook?s level by restricting what I do with my own data.

Facebook, it seems to me that you?ve been trying your hardest to think of users here by offering a work around to Google?s restrictions. Now by removing all mention of Gmail from your site, maybe you?ve just (as SAI suggests) thrown in the towel and decided that with half a billion users, you don?t need Gmail anyway. You could take the high ground here though ? you already let me export all my account data in bulk, so why not just let me export my contacts in an easily usable form?

The bottom line to both of you is this: I know you?re becoming increasingly competitive but please compete with great products, not by hanging on to my contacts. They?re my contacts, so let me do what I want with them.

Now run along and play? but play nice!

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/11/21/google-vs-facebook-a-much-needed-intervention/

40 inch westinghouse 1080p lcd hdtv the dirty applebees

White House Memo: An Electoral Upheaval, but Few Signs of Change

The Thursday meeting is now off ? pushed back to Nov. 30 after the Republicans complained that the White House had not consulted them about their schedule ? and the arms treaty, which faces stiff Republican opposition, is in jeopardy. Two weeks after a midterm election that both sides interpreted as a mandate to change the way Washington does business, little, it seems, has changed.

Just how little was underscored on Wednesday when the two parties finished electing their leaders for the new Congress ? the very same people, including Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, who will go from speaker to the House minority leader, who have spent the past two years at one another?s throats.

For Mr. Obama, who has promised ?midcourse corrections,? the developments are a stark reminder of just how difficult it will be to change the dynamic in Washington. While he was in Asia, top aides back in Washington sketched out their postelection agenda ? and came up with a relatively narrow list of items that might win Republican cooperation, including revamping President George W. Bush?s landmark education bill and extending certain business tax credits. The White House also sees an opportunity to work with Republicans to cut the pet projects known as earmarks. Dan Pfeiffer, Mr. Obama?s communications director, described the White House as ?hopeful but not naïve.?

But other Democrats say the president must come up with an aggressive strategy to put himself back in the driver?s seat. If he cannot pass legislation, they say, he must use his executive authority and the force of his office to advance his agenda in ways that do not require Republican cooperation. The Center for American Progress, a research group with close ties to the administration, put out a report this week called ?The Power of the President? that sought to identify areas where Mr. Obama can bypass Congress.

The report suggests that Mr. Obama can act on a host of domestic and foreign issues, like conserving federal lands, carrying out the Small Business Jobs Act, promoting mediation for homeowners seeking to avoid foreclosure and appointing a special envoy for the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, who could work with Yemen?s government on the terrorism threat there.

?He needs to rise above the definition of the presidency as just being a skirmish between Republicans and you,? said John D. Podesta, the president of the Center for American Progress and a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. ?If he spends two years in the scrum with these guys, that?s what they want. He?s capable of doing things on his own without them.?

The White House has given no sign of any major postelection reorganization or personnel shakeup, and Mr. Obama?s aides have not tipped their hand about how they might address issues, like reducing the deficit or overhauling the tax code, that could offer opportunities for bipartisan compromise.

As president, Mr. Clinton reached deals on the budget, welfare and other issues with the Republican majority that swept Congress in 1994. But if Mr. Clinton?s experience is any guide, it will take Mr. Obama time to find his footing.

Mr. Clinton fumbled for months while the new speaker, Newt Gingrich, captured the public imagination with his 100-day agenda. It was not until the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City in April 1995, Mr. Clinton?s former aides say, that he was able above to rise above the partisan fray with a speech challenging the notion that government was a problem.

?That was big turning point for him,? said Pat Griffin, Mr. Clinton?s director of legislative affairs at the time. ?We built it as something that was bigger than this bad fight.?

Building legislative and political coalitions will be tricky in the current environment. The Tea Party movement is pulling Republicans to the right and warning against compromise. The remaining House Democrats are predominantly liberal and are pushing Mr. Obama to the left. There are few moderates left in either party.

If Mr. Obama is to build support, he must get out of Washington and take his case directly to the American people, said Leslie H. Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. But, he said, the president cannot make that case in the intellectual way that he has in the past.

?The only chance he has of restoring his power is by going to the country,? Mr. Gelb said. ?He can rally the majority around common sense. And he can?t do it in the way he has in the past.?

It is no surprise that the two sides still seem dug in: both are figuring out strategy for the remainder of Mr. Obama?s first term as they head into the 2012 presidential campaign. Mr. Griffin said the shape of the legislative debate would become much clearer next year, when Mr. Obama outlines his budget ? a blueprint for his agenda ? and Republicans counter with theirs.

?The president will propose his budget; it will be dead on arrival if history is any predictor, and at some point there will be a debate about what is the world view of the Republicans and what is the world view of the Democrats,? Mr. Griffin said. ?This is a movie; it?s not a one-act play.?

The Democrats? decision to retain their Congressional leaders does not make it any easier for Mr. Obama. In 1994, Mr. Clinton faced a new crop of Republican and Democratic leaders, which made it easier for him to rebrand himself as willing to cast aside party allegiances. But Mr. Obama has already thrown his lot in with Ms. Pelosi and the Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid.

And in another sign of how little the dynamic has changed, Republicans are reminding the White House of a tart exchange between Mr. Obama and Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the Republican whip, from early in the administration. The two had clashed over the stimulus package, and Mr. Obama noted that elections have consequences and that he had won. Trent Lott, the former Senate Republican leader, said Republicans feel much the same way now.

?There was an election; they won,? Mr. Lott said of the Republicans, ?and they do expect a little more attention, a little more consideration.?

Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=61f9dec2461029eeb6db65186c07b70f

how old is loretta lynn gottadeal audie murphy

Rumor: Nvidia delays dual-GPU GTX 590 to beat Antilles

With AMD's flagship single-GPU Radeon HD 6950 and 6970 cards due arrive sometime this quarter, one has to expect that Nvidia is preparing a new premium offering -- and one would be right, says Fudzilla. The GeForce-maker is readying a graphics card (possibly branded the GTX 590) with two GF110 GPUs strapped onboard, and it could appear "very soon."

According to unnamed sources, Nvidia partners are practically ready to roll, and the company could launch its dual-GPU product before the end of 2010. Unfortunately, that's unlikely to happen. Word has it that Nvidia is waiting for AMD to ship its dual-chip solution, the Radeon HD 6990 (codenamed Antilles), which is on track for the first quarter of next year.


Nvidia currently holds the crown for single-GPU performance with its GeForce GTX 580, and it seems the company wants to ensure a dominate position in the dual-GPU market as well. By delaying the GTX 590 until after the Radeon HD 6990 arrives, it's suggested that Nvidia will have an opportunity tweak its contender before shoving it into the ring.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://www.techspot.com/news/41218-rumor-nvidia-delays-dualgpu-gtx-590-to-beat-antilles.html

fema camps dave niehaus cody zeller

Reid to Push to Allow End of ?Don?t Ask, Don?t Tell?

Senator John McCain of Arizona, the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, led his colleagues in blocking consideration of the bill in September in part because it allowed the repeal of the ?don?t ask, don?t tell? policy. Mr. McCain has not changed his position, and Democrats had been considering stripping the provision to advance the legislation.

But the White House on Wednesday repeated President Obama?s commitment to repealing the ban. In a statement later in the day, Mr. Reid said he would bring the bill to the floor, with the repeal language in place. ?We need to repeal this discriminatory policy so that any American who wants to defend our country can do so,? Mr. Reid said.

Senate Democratic aides said Mr. Reid would try to take up the bill sometime in December, meaning after the Pentagon is due to release a report on how it would carry out a repeal. The report includes a survey of active-duty forces and their families, which shows that a majority do not care if gay men and women serve openly.

That report is due on Dec. 1.

Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan and chairman of the Armed Services Committee, applauded Mr. Reid?s decision and said he would fight for approval of the bill.

In a statement, Mr. Levin said that he would hold hearings on the Pentagon report as soon as it was released and that he had asked Mr. Reid to wait until they were completed before trying to begin debate.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has said he would like to see the ?don?t ask, don?t tell? policy repealed before the end of the year, but some senior military commanders and some lawmakers in Congress have expressed opposition to ending the policy.

Senator McCain?s wife, Cindy, called last week for ending the policy, appearing in a video for an advertising campaign aimed at preventing the bullying of gay teenagers. But then she abruptly reversed herself and said she agreed with her husband.

The House has already approved legislation authorizing repeal, and Mr. Reid?s decision indicated that Democrats, despite heavy losses in the midterm elections, were not backing down from some top legislative priorities, important to the party?s base.

On Wednesday Mr. Reid announced that he would also push to bring up a bill that would create a path to citizenship for certain illegal immigrants who were brought to the United States as small children.

Mr. Reid tried to attach the legislation as an amendment to the military policy bill before the midterm elections, but Republicans blocked the bill, in part because they said that he was using it as a political prop to appeal to Hispanic and gay voters in his re-election campaign in Nevada.

In his race, Mr. Reid promised he would try again to pass the immigration measure, known as the Dream Act. And in a statement on Wednesday he said he would try to do so as a stand-alone bill.

The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi of California, has been discussing the immigration measure with Democratic colleagues but has not scheduled a vote on it, a spokesman said.

The legislation would give legal residency to immigrants who arrived in the United States before age 16 and lived here for at least five years, graduated from high school and completed two years of college or military service. They would be subject to background checks, could not have criminal records, and even if successful would still not be eligible for financial aid like Pell grants.

In a statement, Mr. Reid said: ?If there is a bipartisan bill that makes sense for our country economically, from a national security perspective and one that reflects American values, it is the Dream Act. This bill will give children brought illegally to this country at no fault of their own the chance to earn legal status.?

Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ffbed56dd1f74721273b19e1c2e78e65

marie osmond son death staged terror gene shalit

Thinking Outside the In-box

Search the Internet, and you'll find hundreds of applications designed to help you collaborate with other people more effectively. But examine your own habits, and you'll most likely find that you use just one piece of software for that purpose: an e-mail client.

You're not alone. A recent Forrester Research study found that 83 percent of business users typically send e-mail attachments to colleagues rather than using collaboration software. According to a recent survey by technology consulting company People-OnTheGo, the average information worker spends 3.3 hours a day dealing with e-mail, and 65 percent of such workers have their e-mail client open all the time.

Even Facebook, which once seemed like a likely replacement for e-mail, at least for the young and plugged-in, has acknowledged that e-mail isn't going anywhere. On Monday, the company announced a new messaging service that integrates external e-mail with its own internal messaging system?an admission of the staying power of e-mail, and an attempt to enhance its functionality.

Other software makers seem to have accepted that they'll never pull people's attention away from their e-mail in-boxes. Instead, they're looking to add new collaborative and social capabilities to e-mail.

"It's clear that e-mail is being used and even abused," says Yaacov Cohen, CEO of Mainsoft, a company based in Tel Aviv, Israel, that sells a plug-in called Harmon.ie. The plug-in links an e-mail application to a collaboration platform such as Google Docs, and to a person's social networking profiles, calendar applications, voice over Internet protocol software, and so on. To share a document using Harmon.ie, a user drags it from a sidebar to the body of a message, where it becomes a link. When the recipient clicks on the link, she is taken to the document stored in the chosen collaboration software. Using e-mail alone for collaboration creates confusion and overloads in-boxes, Cohen says.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=258ea4e879c187708c823ae714dc879d

veterans day quotes 40 inch westinghouse 1080p lcd hdtv the dirty

White House Memo: An Electoral Upheaval, but Few Signs of Change

The Thursday meeting is now off ? pushed back to Nov. 30 after the Republicans complained that the White House had not consulted them about their schedule ? and the arms treaty, which faces stiff Republican opposition, is in jeopardy. Two weeks after a midterm election that both sides interpreted as a mandate to change the way Washington does business, little, it seems, has changed.

Just how little was underscored on Wednesday when the two parties finished electing their leaders for the new Congress ? the very same people, including Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, who will go from speaker to the House minority leader, who have spent the past two years at one another?s throats.

For Mr. Obama, who has promised ?midcourse corrections,? the developments are a stark reminder of just how difficult it will be to change the dynamic in Washington. While he was in Asia, top aides back in Washington sketched out their postelection agenda ? and came up with a relatively narrow list of items that might win Republican cooperation, including revamping President George W. Bush?s landmark education bill and extending certain business tax credits. The White House also sees an opportunity to work with Republicans to cut the pet projects known as earmarks. Dan Pfeiffer, Mr. Obama?s communications director, described the White House as ?hopeful but not naïve.?

But other Democrats say the president must come up with an aggressive strategy to put himself back in the driver?s seat. If he cannot pass legislation, they say, he must use his executive authority and the force of his office to advance his agenda in ways that do not require Republican cooperation. The Center for American Progress, a research group with close ties to the administration, put out a report this week called ?The Power of the President? that sought to identify areas where Mr. Obama can bypass Congress.

The report suggests that Mr. Obama can act on a host of domestic and foreign issues, like conserving federal lands, carrying out the Small Business Jobs Act, promoting mediation for homeowners seeking to avoid foreclosure and appointing a special envoy for the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, who could work with Yemen?s government on the terrorism threat there.

?He needs to rise above the definition of the presidency as just being a skirmish between Republicans and you,? said John D. Podesta, the president of the Center for American Progress and a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. ?If he spends two years in the scrum with these guys, that?s what they want. He?s capable of doing things on his own without them.?

The White House has given no sign of any major postelection reorganization or personnel shakeup, and Mr. Obama?s aides have not tipped their hand about how they might address issues, like reducing the deficit or overhauling the tax code, that could offer opportunities for bipartisan compromise.

As president, Mr. Clinton reached deals on the budget, welfare and other issues with the Republican majority that swept Congress in 1994. But if Mr. Clinton?s experience is any guide, it will take Mr. Obama time to find his footing.

Mr. Clinton fumbled for months while the new speaker, Newt Gingrich, captured the public imagination with his 100-day agenda. It was not until the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City in April 1995, Mr. Clinton?s former aides say, that he was able above to rise above the partisan fray with a speech challenging the notion that government was a problem.

?That was big turning point for him,? said Pat Griffin, Mr. Clinton?s director of legislative affairs at the time. ?We built it as something that was bigger than this bad fight.?

Building legislative and political coalitions will be tricky in the current environment. The Tea Party movement is pulling Republicans to the right and warning against compromise. The remaining House Democrats are predominantly liberal and are pushing Mr. Obama to the left. There are few moderates left in either party.

If Mr. Obama is to build support, he must get out of Washington and take his case directly to the American people, said Leslie H. Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. But, he said, the president cannot make that case in the intellectual way that he has in the past.

?The only chance he has of restoring his power is by going to the country,? Mr. Gelb said. ?He can rally the majority around common sense. And he can?t do it in the way he has in the past.?

It is no surprise that the two sides still seem dug in: both are figuring out strategy for the remainder of Mr. Obama?s first term as they head into the 2012 presidential campaign. Mr. Griffin said the shape of the legislative debate would become much clearer next year, when Mr. Obama outlines his budget ? a blueprint for his agenda ? and Republicans counter with theirs.

?The president will propose his budget; it will be dead on arrival if history is any predictor, and at some point there will be a debate about what is the world view of the Republicans and what is the world view of the Democrats,? Mr. Griffin said. ?This is a movie; it?s not a one-act play.?

The Democrats? decision to retain their Congressional leaders does not make it any easier for Mr. Obama. In 1994, Mr. Clinton faced a new crop of Republican and Democratic leaders, which made it easier for him to rebrand himself as willing to cast aside party allegiances. But Mr. Obama has already thrown his lot in with Ms. Pelosi and the Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid.

And in another sign of how little the dynamic has changed, Republicans are reminding the White House of a tart exchange between Mr. Obama and Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the Republican whip, from early in the administration. The two had clashed over the stimulus package, and Mr. Obama noted that elections have consequences and that he had won. Trent Lott, the former Senate Republican leader, said Republicans feel much the same way now.

?There was an election; they won,? Mr. Lott said of the Republicans, ?and they do expect a little more attention, a little more consideration.?

Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=61f9dec2461029eeb6db65186c07b70f

dave niehaus cody zeller bay bridge

Dish streams TV to Android, iOS, BlackBerry, PC, Mac

Dish Network has begun offering its subscribers the ability to watch all of their live and recorded television programs on several devices: smartphones, tablets, desktops, and laptops. To do so, subscribers must download the Dish Remote Access application and use it in conjunction with their broadband-connected Sling-enabled receiver.

Dish has released a new Sling Adapter, a small device that pairs with Dish's ViP 722 or 722k HD DVRs. The Sling Adapter, which is powered and operated through a standard USB connected to the DVR, costs $99 for new and current Dish customers. With it, customers can send their HD or SD live and recorded programming to various devices.

On the receiving end, subscribers will need the free Dish Remote Access app, which lets you access subscribed channels, view all DVR recordings, manage recordings and delete shows, and use a mobile device as a remote control. The following 3G and/or WiFi-enabled platforms are supported: Android devices, iPhone, iPod touch, iPad (TV viewing coming soon on iOS 4.2), BlackBerry (beta app available for Bold 9700, Bold 9000, Curve 8520, and Curve 8900), as well as Windows PCs and Macs.

"DISH Network is proud to be the first pay-TV provider to bring our customers the ability to enjoy their TV anywhere, anytime on a variety of popular devices," Ira Bahr, DISH Network Chief Marketing Officer, said in a statement. "Unlike mobile viewing from cable and telcos that limit access to select programs, our TV Everywhere services give consumers 24x7 access to all of the live and recorded content included with their DISH Network programming subscription."

Earlier this month, Dish attacked Hulu, saying that the service was destroying the TV industry. If that's so, will Dish be the one to save it?

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Software

Source: http://www.techspot.com/news/41216-dish-streams-tv-to-android-ios-blackberry-pc-mac.html

marie osmond son death staged terror gene shalit

Promising New Interactive Football Game On Facebook, ?I Am Playr? [TNW Social Media]