Try This: WidgetBlock. Speed up Chrome page loads by killing the social widgets [TNW Apps]

While we here at TNW are big fans of the social aspect of pages, we understand that there are some of you who aren?t. Not mincing words, social widgets often slow down pages to a crawl when the sites that they reference are having problems.

WidgetBlock is an extension for Google Chrome that simply does what it says ? it blocks widgets. So, if Twitter is courting the failwhale you won?t be staring at a half-completed page. Rather, you?ll be browsing the content of your choice but you?ll have to share it the old way.

I did some testing with WidgetBlock and there are some obvious down sides to the process. While pages do indeed load faster, the extension can lead to a page having a ?broken? look to it. Here on TNW, for instance, the missing Tweet buttons simply get replaced by a text saying ?Tweet?. As you can see in the screenshot, it also leaves a pretty barren area around our RSS button where the Facebook and Twitter widgets should sit:

So the tradeoff is your call to make. It?s worth a look, regardless. While I did experience some faster load times, your mileage may vary.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/11/23/try-this-widgetblock-speed-up-chrome-page-loads-by-killing-the-social-widgets/

dave niehaus cody zeller bay bridge

Fort Benning Protest Dwindles, if Not Its Passion

At its peak a few years ago, more than 17,000 people streamed into town, united in their effort to shut down the School of the Americas, a United States Department of Defense center that they believe has trained Latin American military leaders to torture and murder.

Hundreds of people would cross onto the base and get arrested in mass acts of civil disobedience. Catholic groups staged workshops. Old lefties treated it like a family reunion. Vendors sold bumper stickers and Guatemalan hacky sacks.

So many people from so many left-leaning organizations began showing up that School of the Americas Watch, which runs the protest, rented the local convention center for seminars and concerts.

Enterprising locals set up barbecue stands and charged $10 for parking in nearby lots. The convention bureau helped with hotel arrangements.

The protest has brought the city as much as $2.2 million in business, more than twice what the annual Jehovah?s Witness convention did, said Peter Bowden, president of the Columbus Convention & Visitors Bureau.

?It is, in essence, the equivalent of a fairly large convention for our town, and we tend to treat the attendees in that respect,? Mr. Bowden said.

But the times, they are a changing. This year?s protest, the 20th, drew its smallest crowd ever over the weekend. Both the police and organizers agree that fewer than 5,000 people showed up.

Signs of its decline were everywhere. At the Masonic lodge near the protest site, a local military family had hoped for a lucrative weekend selling hot dogs and drinks. They packed in 15 cases of water, but by Saturday afternoon only a dozen bottles had sold. They did not even bother on Sunday.

As a counterbalance to the protest, the school 10 years ago began offering tours over the same weekend and changed its name to the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. A panel of school leaders volunteers to answer questions and explain that the education of Latin American military personnel now emphasizes democracy and human rights along with military intelligence and psychological operations.

Last year, more than 500 signed up to attend, mostly students from Catholic high schools and colleges. This year, only 128 were bused on base for the 90-minute session.

The small crowd at the gates of Fort Benning disappointed Sheri Hosek, 39, who traveled from Dubuque, Iowa. She had heard about the event through her work with Franciscan nuns.

?There was a lot of hype about it, but it feels like a much smaller presentation than I had expected,? Ms. Hosek said. ?It feels more like a summer festival, a very liberal one of course.?

Maybe it was the economy, some said. Others said that rallying liberal activists after the election of President Obama had become more challenging because many thought the fight was over.

And it did not help that a couple of thousand Jesuit students who usually attend did not come this year, choosing instead to hold their annual teach-in in Washington.

Others wondered if Latin America politics just are not capturing the attention of American youths as they once did.

?My generation is all over the place,? said Ben Johnson, 28, of Athens, Ga., who was grabbing a coffee in a hotel lobby near the base. ?They are completely apathetic, or they?ve completely devoted their entire life to change.?

The protest began after six Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her daughter were killed in El Salvador in November 1989 by a group that a Congressional task force connected to School of the Americas graduates.

On the anniversary the following year, a small group led by the Rev. Roy Bourgeois, a Catholic priest, held a water-only fast at the gates. He has since become an internationally known peace advocate and still lives in a small apartment near the gate.

?Most of the young people in the crowd don?t even know who he is,? said Liz Loescher, 68, an eight-time veteran of the protest who runs the Georgia Conflict Center in Athens.

Stiffer federal penalties have hurt the effort, too. In the late 1990s, almost 3,000 people crossed onto the base and were briefly detained. After the Sept. 11 attacks, when a series of fences were built, that number dropped to 80.

Then a federal judge began handing out six-month sentences. That sent the numbers even lower. Last year, only four people entered the base, the same number as this year. All were arrested and charged with federal trespassing.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5d3c9239d2fbea4b263211f9a1f8fc93

charlyne yi reba mcentire marie osmond son death

Samsung Galaxy Tab sells 600,000 units in a month

Samsung has sold 600,000 units of its Galaxy Tab device worldwide, according to The Korea Herald. Since its launch on November 14, the device has amassed 30,000 unit sales alone in Korea, with the remaining devices being sold in 30 countries around the world, most in North America, Europe, and Asia. Samsung said consumer demand for its Galaxy Tab has outpaced supply in most countries.

Samsung seems to be on track to reach its target of 1 million units sold by the end of this year. The sales estimate is still short of Apple's iPad, which is currently dominating the tablet space; it had 95.5 percent market share in the previous quarter. Apple shipped 1 million of the iOS tablets in the first 28 days after launch. Samsung is planning to launch more Android tablets next year, but that won't be in time for this holiday season.

Running on Android 2.2, the Galaxy Tab features a TFT-LCD capacitive touch screen with a 1024x600 resolution, a 1GHz Cortex A8 Hummingbird Application processor, 512MB of RAM, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 3.0, 3G, and dual cameras for capturing still images, videos, or making video calls. It also has a robust HTML Web browsing experience with Adobe Flash 10.1, as well as support for a number of different formats, including DivX, Xvid, WMV, and MPEG-4.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://www.techspot.com/news/41250-samsung-galaxy-tab-sells-600000-units-in-a-month.html

gene shalit veterans day quotes 40 inch westinghouse 1080p lcd hdtv

White House Memo: For Obama, a Little Help From His Friends

?No more summits!? he said jokingly, having only recently returned from a 10-day diplomatic tour across Asia.

Yet while that Asia trip had mixed results, forcing Mr. Obama to leave without the South Korean trade deal he had expected, the consensus with Europeans and Russians at the NATO summit in Lisbon about how to handle Afghanistan and missile defense gave him a more successful sheen ? even if ultimate success, particularly in Afghanistan, remains problematic.

Mr. Obama was able to lead on a world stage in a way that he has not been able to do lately at home. He did so with public and private assistance from his European and Russian counterparts, many of whom called the summit meeting historic. Acutely aware of his problems at home after the drubbing Democrats took in the midterm elections ? most manifest in Senate Republicans? resistance to the New Start nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia ? the other leaders seemed almost to go out of their way to buoy Mr. Obama.

Their help was not merely volunteered; administration officials actively sought it. ?Throughout the summit, there was intense lobbying by the administration to win support for the ratification process,? said the Czech defense minister, Alexandr Vondra.

And while a two-hour gathering with the European Union was a footnote to the weekend NATO summit meeting that preceded it, the leaders there likewise hailed their exchanges over economic and security concerns.

?I have been to many summits,? the European Commission president, José Manuel Barroso, said afterward, but Lisbon was more ?intimate, informal? and ?a real exchange about the priorities? instead of mere note-reading ? and he gave credit to Mr. Obama.

In the end, then, the more common diplomatic dynamic was flipped: Instead of foreign leaders taking advantage of a weakened counterpart, they rallied to his aid ? for their own interests as much as Mr. Obama?s, given the economic and military stakes.

In particular, they gave Mr. Obama ammunition in his Senate battle for the New Start treaty. He collected a series of supportive statements from European leaders ? from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany to leaders of former Soviet bloc nations, who remain deeply suspicious of Russia and wary of Mr. Obama?s ?reset? policy for warmer relations with Russia.

At a news conference after the NATO session, Mr. Obama said, ?Unprompted, I have received overwhelming support from our allies here that Start ? the New Start treaty ? is a critical component to U.S. and European security.?

The endorsers, he added, include ?those who live right next to Russia, who used to live behind the Iron Curtain, who have the most cause for concern with respect to Russian intentions and who have uniformly said that they will feel safer and more secure if this treaty gets ratified.?

Like the Eastern Europeans, NATO leaders more broadly agreed, in effect, that the Mr. Obama?s ?reset? relationship with Russia had enabled a parallel reset of their own ties with the former Communist bloc leader. The NATO-Russia Council meeting was the first since Russia went to war with Georgia to its south in 2008.

Mr. Obama also made progress drawing Russia into cooperating with, rather than opposing, a new missile defense network in Europe aimed at countering any future threat from Iran. The White House hopes that Russian cooperation could undercut the argument of conservative critics of New Start that the treaty would crimp missile defense plans.

As some Europeans saw it, President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia also seemed to respond to Mr. Obama?s tenuous position at home. Administration officials said that as recently as three weeks ago it was not clear Mr. Medvedev would come, and that days before Lisbon, there was no agreement on a joint statement to issue.

When Mr. Obama had to leave the NATO-Russia meeting for a separately scheduled meeting with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, he had advisers set up a private talk with Mr. Medvedev ? no aides, just one translator.

An official to whom Mr. Obama described their conversation afterward, and who would speak only on the condition of anonymity under White House rules, said it was ?very cordial? though Mr. Obama raised their differences over Georgia. As for New Start?s ratification, Mr. Medvedev expressed confidence ?in the president getting it done,? the official said.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b36109a3d2c8e0bcb14be6d7f290c8b5

fema camps dave niehaus cody zeller

Chinese Project Puts Cow Dung to Work

A rapidly growing industry in China?dairy farming?is also a major new source of greenhouse-gas emissions. But Huishan Dairy in northeast China is trying to change this by installing the world's largest system for generating electricity by collecting methane gas emitted by fermenting cow manure.

The Chinese have not, historically, been big milk drinkers, but decreasing costs and aggressive marketing efforts have changed that. Huishan's new system will prevent methane?which is 23 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas?from reaching the atmosphere. It will also reduce waste and odors, and produce a valuable organic fertilizer that's safer than raw manure.

The operation at Huishan is 10 times the size of the typical systems for generating electricity from cow manure. Its massive scale could help make the project more economical. GE, which is supplying the project's gas-powered generators, also hopes it will act as a showcase for the technology. Methane is not widely harnessed in farming worldwide, largely due to the initial costs, a lack of established economic models, and little government support.

Huishan, one of the biggest dairies in the country, imports 3,000 cows from Australia every month to sustain its massive stock of 250,000 cows?about double the number of dairy cows in the entire state of Florida. Huishan's new electricity generating system will process the waste from 60,000 cows and produce 5.6 megawatts of power. It will generate enough electricity to meet the needs of 3,500 American-size households, which means it will service many more Chinese ones, which use far less energy.

What was previously the largest system for generating electricity from manure produced two megawatts. Most such systems still produce only a few hundred kilowatts. Huishan will capture 20 million cubic meters of biogas (which is about 60 percent methane).

Technology for capturing biogas and putting it to use has existed for a long time. In its simplest form, an enclosed digester allows the anaerobic organisms to break down manure and capture the methane produced. The gas is then siphoned off in a pipe for cooking or lighting. The Chinese government estimates that millions of small farms already have such primitive manure digesters.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=d29c9bdea78958fe43d3c2a175a9d33a

gottadeal audie murphy applebees veterans day 2010

White House Memo: For Obama, a Little Help From His Friends

?No more summits!? he said jokingly, having only recently returned from a 10-day diplomatic tour across Asia.

Yet while that Asia trip had mixed results, forcing Mr. Obama to leave without the South Korean trade deal he had expected, the consensus with Europeans and Russians at the NATO summit in Lisbon about how to handle Afghanistan and missile defense gave him a more successful sheen ? even if ultimate success, particularly in Afghanistan, remains problematic.

Mr. Obama was able to lead on a world stage in a way that he has not been able to do lately at home. He did so with public and private assistance from his European and Russian counterparts, many of whom called the summit meeting historic. Acutely aware of his problems at home after the drubbing Democrats took in the midterm elections ? most manifest in Senate Republicans? resistance to the New Start nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia ? the other leaders seemed almost to go out of their way to buoy Mr. Obama.

Their help was not merely volunteered; administration officials actively sought it. ?Throughout the summit, there was intense lobbying by the administration to win support for the ratification process,? said the Czech defense minister, Alexandr Vondra.

And while a two-hour gathering with the European Union was a footnote to the weekend NATO summit meeting that preceded it, the leaders there likewise hailed their exchanges over economic and security concerns.

?I have been to many summits,? the European Commission president, José Manuel Barroso, said afterward, but Lisbon was more ?intimate, informal? and ?a real exchange about the priorities? instead of mere note-reading ? and he gave credit to Mr. Obama.

In the end, then, the more common diplomatic dynamic was flipped: Instead of foreign leaders taking advantage of a weakened counterpart, they rallied to his aid ? for their own interests as much as Mr. Obama?s, given the economic and military stakes.

In particular, they gave Mr. Obama ammunition in his Senate battle for the New Start treaty. He collected a series of supportive statements from European leaders ? from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany to leaders of former Soviet bloc nations, who remain deeply suspicious of Russia and wary of Mr. Obama?s ?reset? policy for warmer relations with Russia.

At a news conference after the NATO session, Mr. Obama said, ?Unprompted, I have received overwhelming support from our allies here that Start ? the New Start treaty ? is a critical component to U.S. and European security.?

The endorsers, he added, include ?those who live right next to Russia, who used to live behind the Iron Curtain, who have the most cause for concern with respect to Russian intentions and who have uniformly said that they will feel safer and more secure if this treaty gets ratified.?

Like the Eastern Europeans, NATO leaders more broadly agreed, in effect, that the Mr. Obama?s ?reset? relationship with Russia had enabled a parallel reset of their own ties with the former Communist bloc leader. The NATO-Russia Council meeting was the first since Russia went to war with Georgia to its south in 2008.

Mr. Obama also made progress drawing Russia into cooperating with, rather than opposing, a new missile defense network in Europe aimed at countering any future threat from Iran. The White House hopes that Russian cooperation could undercut the argument of conservative critics of New Start that the treaty would crimp missile defense plans.

As some Europeans saw it, President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia also seemed to respond to Mr. Obama?s tenuous position at home. Administration officials said that as recently as three weeks ago it was not clear Mr. Medvedev would come, and that days before Lisbon, there was no agreement on a joint statement to issue.

When Mr. Obama had to leave the NATO-Russia meeting for a separately scheduled meeting with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, he had advisers set up a private talk with Mr. Medvedev ? no aides, just one translator.

An official to whom Mr. Obama described their conversation afterward, and who would speak only on the condition of anonymity under White House rules, said it was ?very cordial? though Mr. Obama raised their differences over Georgia. As for New Start?s ratification, Mr. Medvedev expressed confidence ?in the president getting it done,? the official said.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b36109a3d2c8e0bcb14be6d7f290c8b5

cody zeller bay bridge charlyne yi

Chinese Project Puts Cow Dung to Work

A rapidly growing industry in China?dairy farming?is also a major new source of greenhouse-gas emissions. But Huishan Dairy in northeast China is trying to change this by installing the world's largest system for generating electricity by collecting methane gas emitted by fermenting cow manure.

The Chinese have not, historically, been big milk drinkers, but decreasing costs and aggressive marketing efforts have changed that. Huishan's new system will prevent methane?which is 23 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas?from reaching the atmosphere. It will also reduce waste and odors, and produce a valuable organic fertilizer that's safer than raw manure.

The operation at Huishan is 10 times the size of the typical systems for generating electricity from cow manure. Its massive scale could help make the project more economical. GE, which is supplying the project's gas-powered generators, also hopes it will act as a showcase for the technology. Methane is not widely harnessed in farming worldwide, largely due to the initial costs, a lack of established economic models, and little government support.

Huishan, one of the biggest dairies in the country, imports 3,000 cows from Australia every month to sustain its massive stock of 250,000 cows?about double the number of dairy cows in the entire state of Florida. Huishan's new electricity generating system will process the waste from 60,000 cows and produce 5.6 megawatts of power. It will generate enough electricity to meet the needs of 3,500 American-size households, which means it will service many more Chinese ones, which use far less energy.

What was previously the largest system for generating electricity from manure produced two megawatts. Most such systems still produce only a few hundred kilowatts. Huishan will capture 20 million cubic meters of biogas (which is about 60 percent methane).

Technology for capturing biogas and putting it to use has existed for a long time. In its simplest form, an enclosed digester allows the anaerobic organisms to break down manure and capture the methane produced. The gas is then siphoned off in a pipe for cooking or lighting. The Chinese government estimates that millions of small farms already have such primitive manure digesters.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=d29c9bdea78958fe43d3c2a175a9d33a

audie murphy applebees veterans day 2010 fema camps

White House Memo: For Obama, a Little Help From His Friends

?No more summits!? he said jokingly, having only recently returned from a 10-day diplomatic tour across Asia.

Yet while that Asia trip had mixed results, forcing Mr. Obama to leave without the South Korean trade deal he had expected, the consensus with Europeans and Russians at the NATO summit in Lisbon about how to handle Afghanistan and missile defense gave him a more successful sheen ? even if ultimate success, particularly in Afghanistan, remains problematic.

Mr. Obama was able to lead on a world stage in a way that he has not been able to do lately at home. He did so with public and private assistance from his European and Russian counterparts, many of whom called the summit meeting historic. Acutely aware of his problems at home after the drubbing Democrats took in the midterm elections ? most manifest in Senate Republicans? resistance to the New Start nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia ? the other leaders seemed almost to go out of their way to buoy Mr. Obama.

Their help was not merely volunteered; administration officials actively sought it. ?Throughout the summit, there was intense lobbying by the administration to win support for the ratification process,? said the Czech defense minister, Alexandr Vondra.

And while a two-hour gathering with the European Union was a footnote to the weekend NATO summit meeting that preceded it, the leaders there likewise hailed their exchanges over economic and security concerns.

?I have been to many summits,? the European Commission president, José Manuel Barroso, said afterward, but Lisbon was more ?intimate, informal? and ?a real exchange about the priorities? instead of mere note-reading ? and he gave credit to Mr. Obama.

In the end, then, the more common diplomatic dynamic was flipped: Instead of foreign leaders taking advantage of a weakened counterpart, they rallied to his aid ? for their own interests as much as Mr. Obama?s, given the economic and military stakes.

In particular, they gave Mr. Obama ammunition in his Senate battle for the New Start treaty. He collected a series of supportive statements from European leaders ? from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany to leaders of former Soviet bloc nations, who remain deeply suspicious of Russia and wary of Mr. Obama?s ?reset? policy for warmer relations with Russia.

At a news conference after the NATO session, Mr. Obama said, ?Unprompted, I have received overwhelming support from our allies here that Start ? the New Start treaty ? is a critical component to U.S. and European security.?

The endorsers, he added, include ?those who live right next to Russia, who used to live behind the Iron Curtain, who have the most cause for concern with respect to Russian intentions and who have uniformly said that they will feel safer and more secure if this treaty gets ratified.?

Like the Eastern Europeans, NATO leaders more broadly agreed, in effect, that the Mr. Obama?s ?reset? relationship with Russia had enabled a parallel reset of their own ties with the former Communist bloc leader. The NATO-Russia Council meeting was the first since Russia went to war with Georgia to its south in 2008.

Mr. Obama also made progress drawing Russia into cooperating with, rather than opposing, a new missile defense network in Europe aimed at countering any future threat from Iran. The White House hopes that Russian cooperation could undercut the argument of conservative critics of New Start that the treaty would crimp missile defense plans.

As some Europeans saw it, President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia also seemed to respond to Mr. Obama?s tenuous position at home. Administration officials said that as recently as three weeks ago it was not clear Mr. Medvedev would come, and that days before Lisbon, there was no agreement on a joint statement to issue.

When Mr. Obama had to leave the NATO-Russia meeting for a separately scheduled meeting with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, he had advisers set up a private talk with Mr. Medvedev ? no aides, just one translator.

An official to whom Mr. Obama described their conversation afterward, and who would speak only on the condition of anonymity under White House rules, said it was ?very cordial? though Mr. Obama raised their differences over Georgia. As for New Start?s ratification, Mr. Medvedev expressed confidence ?in the president getting it done,? the official said.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b36109a3d2c8e0bcb14be6d7f290c8b5

fema camps dave niehaus cody zeller

How Mobile Phones Jump-Start Developing Economies

As one of the fastest-spreading technologies in history, the mobile phone has been transformative for the billions of people in the developing world who never had a landline or an Internet connection. One of the most unexpected benefits is its ability to deliver banking services.

Veronica Suarez, like some 2.5 billion other adults on the planet, has no bank account of her own. Suarez and her husband run a small grocery store in Quito, Ecuador, a city of about 1.4 million people on a plateau ringed with dormant volcanoes. In the past, she would often spend half a day traveling to pay bills in cash. But since June, she has been testing a mobile banking service called Mony, which is run by the Panama-based startup YellowPepper Holding. Now she can simply type out text messages that zap payments to the phones of the delivery men who bring cases of Coca-Cola and boxes of vegetable oil to her shop. That could enable her to save travel time, reduce the risk of getting robbed, and run her business more efficiently.

"It works pretty well," says Suarez, whose store is one of 52 mom-and-pop shops in Ecuador taking part in the tests. "But sometimes I am $50 short to pay the delivery man. It would be better if they loaned money, too."

Soon, they might. Worldwide, dozens of companies are introducing mobile wallets that store money in cell phones instead of bank accounts. Such schemes help the vast ranks of the "unbanked"?those huddled masses who yearn to easily send funds to distant family members, pay bills, or even take out small loans, but don't have access to financial services. "The mobile wallet can be transformational," says YellowPepper's founder and president, Serge Elkiner, who was in Ecuador in November demonstrating his system to officials from neighboring Colombia. "We have the chance to bring hundreds of millions into the banking system."

Entrepreneurs say mobile wallets are feasible thanks to the rapid expansion of cell-phone use in poorer regions of the world. In the past five years, operators have added more than two billion mobile accounts in developing and poor nations, according to data from the International Telecommunication Union. That compares to 435 million new accounts in wealthy nations (see chart).

As a result, even in poor regions without clean water or electricity, most adults are now connected. "In pretty much any developing country, in any rural area, you can get the four Cs: Coca-Cola, cigarettes, condoms, and cell phones," says Robert Katz, an associate with the Acumen Fund, a nonprofit that invests in companies trying to address poverty. "The cell-phone companies have been successful in creating ubiquity, so the challenge for the next generation of startup companies and entrepreneurs is leveraging that installed base to deliver real economic and social value to the poor."

There's no shortage of ideas for how to do that. One company in India is offering basic medical diagnoses over the phone to people who live far from a doctor; patients can pay with phone credits. Others are trying to deliver market information to farmers or fishermen, so they can take their goods to the places where they are in demand.

In Ecuador, the Mony service is filling a real need, says Elkiner. According to the consulting firm Bankable Frontier Associates, more than 75 percent of Ecuadorians have a cell phone but only 35 percent have a bank account, about average for poor and developing nations. To open a conventional bank account in Ecuador, you need several hundred dollars and proof of address?two things many Ecuadorians don't have. To sign up for a YellowPepper mobile account, all that's needed is an ID, a $5 deposit, and a cell phone. The service is slated for launch in 2011 in partnership with mobile-phone company Porta and a local bank.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=bd4f34066ab83fd9231c9daa98b2513c

veterans day quotes 40 inch westinghouse 1080p lcd hdtv the dirty