Second Hat in the Ring for Republican Leader

In a video announcement to members of the national committee, Ms. Wagner said the party needed new leadership to prepare for the 2012 presidential campaign, as well as a renewed focus on fund-raising, transparency and accountability.

?We must be efficient, relevant, professional and credible,? Ms. Wagner said. ?We must start immediately to erase past debt and to restore the confidence of our donor base. We must have these resources in order to take back the White House and complete the job that was started this year.?

Ms. Wagner, a former national co-chairwoman of the committee who also served as an ambassador to Luxembourg under President George W. Bush, is the second person to formally announce intentions to run for the post. This month, a former Republican chairman from Michigan, Saul Anuzis, declared his intention to run.

Several other top Republican officials are considering making a bid, including Maria Cino, a longtime Republican leader with close ties to the Bush administration, and Gentry Collins, who recently left his position as political director for the national committee.

The current chairman, Michael Steele, whose term expires in January, has not said whether he intends to seek re-election. His stewardship of the party has been sharply criticized by many Republicans, especially his handling of fund-raising, even though the party scored sweeping victories in the midterm election and captured control of the House.

The 168 members of the Republican National Committee are scheduled to meet in Washington in January to elect a leader.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=2f81e3c55eec4f631a94ea9db2df49b1

juan manuel marquez vs michael katsidis steven pieper ernest borgnine cwtv

Blog - Poker n' Face

Obama Freezes Pay for Federal Workers for Two Years

?The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require some broad sacrifice and that sacrifice must be shared by employees of the federal government,? Mr. Obama said at a White House news conference.

?I did not reach this decision easily,? he said. ?This is not just a line item on a federal ledger. These are people?s lives.?

He called federal workers ?patriots who love their country? but added that ?I?m asking civil servants to do what they?ve always done? and sacrifice for the good of the nation.

The president?s proposal comes a day before he hosts Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders at the White House to begin mapping a way forward after midterm elections handed Republicans control of the House and six more seats in the Senate. The meeting, which was delayed when Republicans rebuffed Mr. Obama?s first proposed date, will be the first time since the midterms that the defeated Democrats and the triumphant Republicans sit down to figure out whether they can work together.

At the top of the agenda are the economy and federal spending, both prime targets of voter anger during the just-concluded campaign. Even before the new Congress takes office in January, the two sides must tackle such matters as whether to extend the Bush-era tax cuts that expire at the end of the year and whether to extend unemployment insurance payments that expire for many Americans as well.

The White House meeting also comes a day before a fiscal commission appointed by Mr. Obama is scheduled to issue its final report on how to curb deficit spending, a topic that has polarized Washington over questions about tax increases and entitlement benefit cuts.

Mr. Obama expressed optimism that the meeting with legislators would be a productive and fresh beginning. ?My hope is starting today, we can begin a bipartisan conversation about our future,? he said. ?Everybody?s going to have to cooperate. We can?t afford to fall back onto the same old ideologies or the same stale sound bites.?

The president?s proposed pay freeze would wipe out plans for a 1.4 percent across-the-board raise in 2011 for 2.1 million federal civilian employees, including those working at the Defense Department. But the freeze would not affect the nation?s uniformed military personnel. It would also mean no raise in 2012 for civilian employees.

The pay freeze will save $2 billion in the current fiscal year that ends in September 2011, $28 billion over five years and more than $60 billion over 10 years, according to Jeffrey Zients, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget and the government?s chief performance officer. That represents just a tiny dent in a $1.3 trillion annual deficit but it offers a symbolic gesture toward public anger over unemployment, the anemic economic recovery and rising national debt.

Mr. Zients said the president made the announcement on Monday because of an approaching legal deadline for submitting a pay plan to Congress. But by doing it now, the president also effectively gets ahead of Republicans who have been talking about making such a move once they assume greater power in January. Some Republicans have gone further, proposing to slash federal worker salaries.

With Republicans vowing to make deep budget cuts, Mr. Obama must decide how far he is willing to go and where he will draw a line. He pointed out that he has already found $20 billion in savings from eliminating or scaling back unnecessary programs, identified $150 billion in improper payments and proposed selling $8 billion in unneeded federal buildings and land. ?We believe it?s the first of many difficult steps ahead,? Mr. Zients said.

The federal workforce is an obvious first target, if one fraught with political risk for a president who relies on union support. Critics have said the federal workforce has been protected from the ravages of the economy. Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute referred to federal workers, in a study in June, as ?an elite island of secure and high-paid workers, separated from the ocean of average American workers.?

Mr. Edwards found that federal civilian workers had an average annual wage of $81,258 in 2009, compared with $50,464 for the nation?s private-sector workers. Average federal salaries rose 58 percent from 2000 to 2009, compared with 30 percent in the private sector, according to his study.

Union leaders said Mr. Obama was playing politics at workers? expense. ?It?s a panic reaction,? John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in an interview. ?It?s superficial. People in this country voted for jobs and income. Sticking it to a V.A. nurse and a Social Security worker is not the way to go.?

Mr. Gage said the notion that federal employees make too much money ?is a myth,? especially in light of million-dollar bonuses paid to Wall Street executives who he said helped trigger the financial crisis that plunged the nation into recession. A typical border patrol officer makes $34,000 a year, a nursing assistant makes $27,000 and a mine inspector makes $38,000, Mr. Gage said. ?We?re an easy scapegoat,? he said. ?We weren?t the ones who got us into this fix.?

Republicans welcomed Mr. Obama?s announcement even as they criticized it as not aggressive enough.

?At a time when our nation?s seniors have been denied a cost-of-living increase and private sector hiring is stagnant, it is both necessary and quite frankly long overdue to institute a pay freeze for the federal workforce,? Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican who is likely to become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said in a statement.

This is not the first time Mr. Obama has addressed government pay to make a political point. He froze the salaries of his own top White House staff members when he took office 22 months ago and later extended that to senior political appointees throughout the government and canceled their bonuses.

In their draft report, the chairmen of Mr. Obama?s fiscal commission proposed a three-year freeze for federal employees.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b194c27294d553f3a7fdd3b500f43ba5

oklahoma state football fanny brice randy shannon walmart cyber monday

House Censure: Humbling to Some, but Not All

In the genteel parliamentary history of the House of Representatives there lurk rowdy days of rough-and-tumble brawls, beatings, chokings, fist-fights, upended hairpieces, stentorian demands for apologies unheeded and a lot of sneaky conduct and foul-mouth talk. Some did nothing bad, or almost nothing.

But they all wound up where Representative Charles B. Rangel is expected to find himself this week: in the well of the House, facing the shame of formal censure. The choreographed mortification ritual has played out more than a score of times since 1832. Convicted by peers, the transgressor ? all have been men ? stands before the assembled members and a packed gallery of spectators and reporters as the speaker reads the rebuke.

?What it?s saying is you?ve brought disgrace to the House of Representatives, you?ve discredited the institution that you serve in,? said Ilona Nickels, an author and expert on Congressional affairs. ?You have impugned the integrity of our proceedings. You?re a disgraceful person. And you?re going to stand there in the well of the House and we?re going to read these charges against you and we?re going to, in essence, say, ?Shame on you.? It doesn?t really help your résumé, or your obit for that matter.?

It is also a moment of truth, not for the fainthearted.

On Oct. 27, 1921, Representative Thomas L. Blanton, a Texas Democrat, faced it with deep anxiety. He had been convicted of entering in The Congressional Record a letter that was, in a colleague?s words, ?unspeakable, vile, foul, filthy, profane, blasphemous and obscene.? It involved a squabble between union and nonunion printers, and by today?s standards was relatively mild stuff.

As the speaker finished his condemnation, Mr. Blanton turned ashen and fled the chamber. ?In the corridor he fell exhausted, striking his head on the marble floor,? The New York Times reported. ?He rested a few minutes on a couch, refused medical aid and shuffled to his office, tears running down his face as he forced his way between spectators and members who were leaving the session.?

They don?t all cry and carry on. Depending on the offense, its probable fallout and the thickness of a politician?s skin, censured members have shown humility or defiance, perhaps relieved that the practical consequences are only dishonor and a need to face voters at the next election, well short of immediate expulsion, if slightly more humiliating than a slap-on-the-wrist reprimand. (Officially, there have been 22 acts of House censure, but some are debatable because the censures appear to have been politically motivated.)

As censurable violations go, the seriousness of Mr. Rangel?s fall somewhere in the middle. He was convicted by a subcommittee of the House ethics committee of 11 violations, including improper fund-raising, failing to pay taxes on rental income and failing to report income on Congressional financial-disclosure forms, not of stealing fortunes, battering colleagues or cornering pages in the anterooms. It was much worse in 1873, when Representatives Oakes Ames, a Massachusetts Republican, and James Brooks, a New York Democrat, were censured for bribery in the Crédit Mobilier scandal, in which millions were skimmed from stock sales during construction of the nation?s first transcontinental railroad, the Union Pacific.

In 1870, three Republican congressmen ? Benjamin F. Whittemore of South Carolina, John T. Deweese of North Carolina and Roderick R. Butler of Tennessee ? were censured for selling appointments to Annapolis and West Point. And in 1979, Representative Charles C. Diggs Jr., a Michigan Democrat, was censured and resigned after being convicted of mail fraud and padding his staff payroll.

Many 19th-century censures were for ?unparliamentary language,? a grab-bag for name-calling, mud-slinging and insults, mostly in Civil War-era debates. But in 1864, Democratic Representatives Alexander Long of Ohio and Benjamin G. Harris of Maryland were cited for ?treasonable utterances? ? backing the Confederacy.

?When you look at the list for all the various reasons people were disciplined, it really is a function of the times,? Ms. Nickels said. ?Every era has its own ethos ? what?s considered horrible and what?s not considered horrible.?

Kerri MacDonald contributed reporting.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=7fc5f50d9be2268b50046a0f55cb74ee

ernest borgnine cwtv bee movie jenni lyn watson

Google Earth 6 released, with 3D trees!

Google has introduced Google Earth 6, adding a number of significant upgrades and improvements. Most importantly, Street View has been more deeply integrated into Google Earth and users can now fly from space to the street wherever Google has Street View imagery. To do so, pick up the little Pegman icon docked right alongside the navigation controls and drop him wherever you see a highlighted blue road.

Google has also added more historical imagery, which allows users to see earlier photography of the same location on a timeline (from 1945 to the present). Furthermore, it's now easier to spot said imagery: when you fly to an area where it is available, the date of the oldest imagery will appear in the status bar as a clickable option at the bottom of the screen.

Last but not least, Google Earth now has 3D trees to make its environments more realistic. Google says dozens of species of trees are represented in a number of 3D-modeled parks and public places. The search giant has planted more than 80 million virtual trees in places such as Athens, Berlin, Chicago, New York City, San Francisco, and Tokyo, with more to come.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://www.techspot.com/news/41344-google-earth-6-released-with-3d-trees.html

randy shannon walmart cyber monday bryan cranston cyber monday deals 2010

Obama Freezes Pay for Federal Workers for Two Years

?The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require some broad sacrifice and that sacrifice must be shared by employees of the federal government,? Mr. Obama said at a White House news conference.

?I did not reach this decision easily,? he said. ?This is not just a line item on a federal ledger. These are people?s lives.?

He called federal workers ?patriots who love their country? but added that ?I?m asking civil servants to do what they?ve always done? and sacrifice for the good of the nation.

The president?s proposal comes a day before he hosts Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders at the White House to begin mapping a way forward after midterm elections handed Republicans control of the House and six more seats in the Senate. The meeting, which was delayed when Republicans rebuffed Mr. Obama?s first proposed date, will be the first time since the midterms that the defeated Democrats and the triumphant Republicans sit down to figure out whether they can work together.

At the top of the agenda are the economy and federal spending, both prime targets of voter anger during the just-concluded campaign. Even before the new Congress takes office in January, the two sides must tackle such matters as whether to extend the Bush-era tax cuts that expire at the end of the year and whether to extend unemployment insurance payments that expire for many Americans as well.

The White House meeting also comes a day before a fiscal commission appointed by Mr. Obama is scheduled to issue its final report on how to curb deficit spending, a topic that has polarized Washington over questions about tax increases and entitlement benefit cuts.

Mr. Obama expressed optimism that the meeting with legislators would be a productive and fresh beginning. ?My hope is starting today, we can begin a bipartisan conversation about our future,? he said. ?Everybody?s going to have to cooperate. We can?t afford to fall back onto the same old ideologies or the same stale sound bites.?

The president?s proposed pay freeze would wipe out plans for a 1.4 percent across-the-board raise in 2011 for 2.1 million federal civilian employees, including those working at the Defense Department. But the freeze would not affect the nation?s uniformed military personnel. It would also mean no raise in 2012 for civilian employees.

The pay freeze will save $2 billion in the current fiscal year that ends in September 2011, $28 billion over five years and more than $60 billion over 10 years, according to Jeffrey Zients, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget and the government?s chief performance officer. That represents just a tiny dent in a $1.3 trillion annual deficit but it offers a symbolic gesture toward public anger over unemployment, the anemic economic recovery and rising national debt.

Mr. Zients said the president made the announcement on Monday because of an approaching legal deadline for submitting a pay plan to Congress. But by doing it now, the president also effectively gets ahead of Republicans who have been talking about making such a move once they assume greater power in January. Some Republicans have gone further, proposing to slash federal worker salaries.

With Republicans vowing to make deep budget cuts, Mr. Obama must decide how far he is willing to go and where he will draw a line. He pointed out that he has already found $20 billion in savings from eliminating or scaling back unnecessary programs, identified $150 billion in improper payments and proposed selling $8 billion in unneeded federal buildings and land. ?We believe it?s the first of many difficult steps ahead,? Mr. Zients said.

The federal workforce is an obvious first target, if one fraught with political risk for a president who relies on union support. Critics have said the federal workforce has been protected from the ravages of the economy. Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute referred to federal workers, in a study in June, as ?an elite island of secure and high-paid workers, separated from the ocean of average American workers.?

Mr. Edwards found that federal civilian workers had an average annual wage of $81,258 in 2009, compared with $50,464 for the nation?s private-sector workers. Average federal salaries rose 58 percent from 2000 to 2009, compared with 30 percent in the private sector, according to his study.

Union leaders said Mr. Obama was playing politics at workers? expense. ?It?s a panic reaction,? John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in an interview. ?It?s superficial. People in this country voted for jobs and income. Sticking it to a V.A. nurse and a Social Security worker is not the way to go.?

Mr. Gage said the notion that federal employees make too much money ?is a myth,? especially in light of million-dollar bonuses paid to Wall Street executives who he said helped trigger the financial crisis that plunged the nation into recession. A typical border patrol officer makes $34,000 a year, a nursing assistant makes $27,000 and a mine inspector makes $38,000, Mr. Gage said. ?We?re an easy scapegoat,? he said. ?We weren?t the ones who got us into this fix.?

Republicans welcomed Mr. Obama?s announcement even as they criticized it as not aggressive enough.

?At a time when our nation?s seniors have been denied a cost-of-living increase and private sector hiring is stagnant, it is both necessary and quite frankly long overdue to institute a pay freeze for the federal workforce,? Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican who is likely to become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said in a statement.

This is not the first time Mr. Obama has addressed government pay to make a political point. He froze the salaries of his own top White House staff members when he took office 22 months ago and later extended that to senior political appointees throughout the government and canceled their bonuses.

In their draft report, the chairmen of Mr. Obama?s fiscal commission proposed a three-year freeze for federal employees.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b194c27294d553f3a7fdd3b500f43ba5

bcs projections uncle buck oklahoma state football fanny brice

Obama Freezes Pay for Federal Workers for Two Years

?The hard truth is that getting this deficit under control is going to require some broad sacrifice and that sacrifice must be shared by employees of the federal government,? Mr. Obama said at a White House news conference.

?I did not reach this decision easily,? he said. ?This is not just a line item on a federal ledger. These are people?s lives.?

He called federal workers ?patriots who love their country? but added that ?I?m asking civil servants to do what they?ve always done? and sacrifice for the good of the nation.

The president?s proposal comes a day before he hosts Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders at the White House to begin mapping a way forward after midterm elections handed Republicans control of the House and six more seats in the Senate. The meeting, which was delayed when Republicans rebuffed Mr. Obama?s first proposed date, will be the first time since the midterms that the defeated Democrats and the triumphant Republicans sit down to figure out whether they can work together.

At the top of the agenda are the economy and federal spending, both prime targets of voter anger during the just-concluded campaign. Even before the new Congress takes office in January, the two sides must tackle such matters as whether to extend the Bush-era tax cuts that expire at the end of the year and whether to extend unemployment insurance payments that expire for many Americans as well.

The White House meeting also comes a day before a fiscal commission appointed by Mr. Obama is scheduled to issue its final report on how to curb deficit spending, a topic that has polarized Washington over questions about tax increases and entitlement benefit cuts.

Mr. Obama expressed optimism that the meeting with legislators would be a productive and fresh beginning. ?My hope is starting today, we can begin a bipartisan conversation about our future,? he said. ?Everybody?s going to have to cooperate. We can?t afford to fall back onto the same old ideologies or the same stale sound bites.?

The president?s proposed pay freeze would wipe out plans for a 1.4 percent across-the-board raise in 2011 for 2.1 million federal civilian employees, including those working at the Defense Department. But the freeze would not affect the nation?s uniformed military personnel. It would also mean no raise in 2012 for civilian employees.

The pay freeze will save $2 billion in the current fiscal year that ends in September 2011, $28 billion over five years and more than $60 billion over 10 years, according to Jeffrey Zients, deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget and the government?s chief performance officer. That represents just a tiny dent in a $1.3 trillion annual deficit but it offers a symbolic gesture toward public anger over unemployment, the anemic economic recovery and rising national debt.

Mr. Zients said the president made the announcement on Monday because of an approaching legal deadline for submitting a pay plan to Congress. But by doing it now, the president also effectively gets ahead of Republicans who have been talking about making such a move once they assume greater power in January. Some Republicans have gone further, proposing to slash federal worker salaries.

With Republicans vowing to make deep budget cuts, Mr. Obama must decide how far he is willing to go and where he will draw a line. He pointed out that he has already found $20 billion in savings from eliminating or scaling back unnecessary programs, identified $150 billion in improper payments and proposed selling $8 billion in unneeded federal buildings and land. ?We believe it?s the first of many difficult steps ahead,? Mr. Zients said.

The federal workforce is an obvious first target, if one fraught with political risk for a president who relies on union support. Critics have said the federal workforce has been protected from the ravages of the economy. Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute referred to federal workers, in a study in June, as ?an elite island of secure and high-paid workers, separated from the ocean of average American workers.?

Mr. Edwards found that federal civilian workers had an average annual wage of $81,258 in 2009, compared with $50,464 for the nation?s private-sector workers. Average federal salaries rose 58 percent from 2000 to 2009, compared with 30 percent in the private sector, according to his study.

Union leaders said Mr. Obama was playing politics at workers? expense. ?It?s a panic reaction,? John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in an interview. ?It?s superficial. People in this country voted for jobs and income. Sticking it to a V.A. nurse and a Social Security worker is not the way to go.?

Mr. Gage said the notion that federal employees make too much money ?is a myth,? especially in light of million-dollar bonuses paid to Wall Street executives who he said helped trigger the financial crisis that plunged the nation into recession. A typical border patrol officer makes $34,000 a year, a nursing assistant makes $27,000 and a mine inspector makes $38,000, Mr. Gage said. ?We?re an easy scapegoat,? he said. ?We weren?t the ones who got us into this fix.?

Republicans welcomed Mr. Obama?s announcement even as they criticized it as not aggressive enough.

?At a time when our nation?s seniors have been denied a cost-of-living increase and private sector hiring is stagnant, it is both necessary and quite frankly long overdue to institute a pay freeze for the federal workforce,? Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican who is likely to become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said in a statement.

This is not the first time Mr. Obama has addressed government pay to make a political point. He froze the salaries of his own top White House staff members when he took office 22 months ago and later extended that to senior political appointees throughout the government and canceled their bonuses.

In their draft report, the chairmen of Mr. Obama?s fiscal commission proposed a three-year freeze for federal employees.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b194c27294d553f3a7fdd3b500f43ba5

oklahoma state football fanny brice randy shannon walmart cyber monday

Nook Color rooted, is it an eReader or Android tablet now? [TNW Gadgets]

Unsurprisingly, the Android 2.1 Nook Color has been rooted, less than two weeks after it hit the market.

We?re hardly surprised at this news (the root was accomplished by XDA) ? it was inevitable. However, now the real question about the Nook Color arises: is it an eReader or a tablet?

With the e-ink WiFi-only third generation Kindle being sold by Amazon for $139, and the tablet leader the iPad at $499 for the cheapest model, the $249 price tag of the Nook Color must be making a number of people pause when deciding on what to buy. With the device now rooted, it could become an even harder task to make this decision, as essentially you?re getting a quality-built touch device (according to nearly all reviews) at half the price of the iPad and $350 less than the also-Android Galaxy Tab (no including the data plan of course).

Of course, now that it?s rooted, it?ll only be a matter of time before Android 2.2 builds appear (it should have the hardware to handle it) making it all the more attractive. However, the Nook Color does have some drawbacks if you want to use it as a dedicated Android tablet (i.e. reading won?t be your primary use). The most glaring problem is a lack of a camera, which of course also afflicts the iPad.  Also, battery life is a bit of an issue, as it?s only about half as good as the iPad with WiFi running.

On the other hand, the thing is just $249, is light and is attractively built. So if you don?t yet own a Kindle (or perhaps you do, but don?t want to spend the money on an iPad) this could be a great compromise between the heavier Apple device and the black and white Kindle.

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2010/11/30/nook-color-rooted-is-it-an-ereader-or-android-tablet-now/

best buy cyber monday sugar bowl 2011 bcs projections uncle buck

Blog - Card Trick Leads to New Bound on Data Compression

Here's a card trick to impress your friends. Give a deck of cards to a pal and ask him or her to cut the deck, draw six cards and list their colours. You then immediately name the cards that have been drawn.

Magic? Not quite. Instead, it's the next best thing: mathematics. The key is to arrange the deck in advance so that the sequence of the card colours follows a specific pattern called a binary De Bruijn cycle. A De Bruijn sequence is a set from an alphabet in which every possible subsequence appears exactly once.

So when a deck of cards meets this criteria, it uniquely defines any sequences of six consecutive cards. All you have to do to perform the trick is memorise the sequences.

Usually these kinds of tricks come about as the result of some new development in mathematical thinking. Today, Travis Gagie from the University of Chile in Santiago turns the tables. He says that this trick has led him to a new mathematical bound on data compression

Gagie achieves this new bound by considering a related trick. Instead of pre-arranging the cards, you shuffle the pack and then ask your friend to draw seven cards. He or she then lists the cards' colours, replaces them in the pack and cuts the deck. You then examine the deck and say which cards were drawn.

This time you're relying on probability to get the right answer. "It is not hard to show that the probability of two septuples of cards having the same colours in the same order is at most 1/128," say Gagie.

He goes on to consider the probability of correctly predicting the sequence of cards pulled at random from a deck of a certain size and after a few extra steps, finds a lower bound on the probability of doing this correctly.

This turns out to be closely related to various problems of data compression and leads to a lower bound than has been found by any other means.

"We know of no previous lower bounds comparable to [this one]," he says.

That's impressive, a really neat trick in itself.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1011.4609: Bounds from a Card Trick

Print Favorite Share facebook twitter
-->

Powered by WizardRSS | Best Membership Site Software

Source: http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=023b7ec7200686447ca34d68f025ac14

steven pieper ernest borgnine cwtv bee movie